|
Forum List
>
Café LA
>
Topic
OT:AE compatible Plug-insPosted by Anonymous User
Mike,
In the past, I've used with FCP: Effects Essentials Eureka! (FCP Only) G Filters (FCP Only) Boris Continuum and RED DFT 55mm CGM (FCP Only) CHV (FCP Only) Trapcode Digital Anarchy Red Giant: Knoll & Magic Bullet dvGarage Pinnacle Image Lounge & Composite Wizard Re:Vision Twixtor Real Viz Retimer Sapphire Lyric Grain Surgery Joe's Filters (FCP Only) DigiEffects Stib's Filters Synthetic Apeture Too Much Too Soon Ultimatte Virtix And of course: Telly's FX A full list of the plugins that work with FCP is on the DVD that comes with my book. Check it out. Kevin Monahan Social Support Lead, DV Products Adobe Adobe After Effects Adobe Premiere Pro Adobe After Effects and Premiere Pro Community Blog Follow Me on Twitter!
Hello, Michael!
The one I find truly amazing is Color Finesse. A fantastic color correction system, with most of the functionality found in really high-end CC systems. A new version was announed last year, but it wasn't released as far as I know. If FCP at some point gets decent masking tools, the usefulness of CF would be spectacular! Bear in mind, however, that usually the plug-ins that work well (like Color Finesse or Continuum) are not just regular AE plug-ins but are adapted to FCP in someway. Unfortunately, FCP supports a very old AE plug-in spec, and the really cool AE plug-ins (like the ones from Trapcode) won't do anything useful in FCP (since they can't take advantage of mask paths, cameras, lights, adjustment layers, etc.). Another problem with AE plug-ins is that they work in RGB space, so using them in a YUV sequence frequently brings gamma/color shifts. Because of all this, I prefer using AE plug-ins in AE. And in FCP, I feel the best ones are the ones made by the FXscipt geniuses, Graeme Nattress and Joe Maller. Boris Contiuum is also amazing, but very expensive IMHO. I usually prefer plug-ins that work in the host interface (like Continuum) rather than the ones that kind of take control of the whole thing (like RED) with their own timelines and such, especially since FCP has a good interface for keyframe animation. All the best Adolfo Rozenfeld Buenos Aires - Argentina www.adolforozenfeld.com
Color Finesse
that is really the only AE one I ever really use in FCP David at Movies Rock in Toronto [www.tofcpug.com]
I'm not David, Michael, but I would say Color Finesse is really popular. Maybe "popular" is not the right word, probably "important" is more accurate.
I know HD online/finishing houses that use it prominently (is that an English word). I'd say at high end FCP suites it's almost a must have, since clients are so impressed by how much of what you normally do on a Davinci system can be done with Color Finesse, inside FCP. As a consultant, I saw several FCP systems for online use get aproved BECAUSE of Color Finesse. If you want to impress someone, fire Color Finesse. That's how good it is! Also, a lot of these users were thrilled with the announcement that Color Finesse was going to work with control surfaces, just like in those expensive color correction rooms. But that version wasn't realeased, unfortunately. All the best! Adolfo Rozenfeld Buenos Aires - Argentina www.adolforozenfeld.com
Grafixjoe, just in case: The AE version and FCP version are not same one. The version bundled with AE Pro won't work with FCP.
If you have the FCP version, maybe you need an update for FCP 5.0x. The latest version is something like 1.57 All the best, Adolfo Adolfo Rozenfeld Buenos Aires - Argentina www.adolforozenfeld.com
If it's a FCP version...then it's not an AE plug-in. This should be made clear that they are 2 different purchases. FCP uses some AE 3rd party plug-ins without having to purchase FCP versions (which is what I thought Mike was referring to).
Mike? Are you looking for AE 3rd party plugs that work in FCP? - Joey When life gives you dilemmas...make dilemmanade. ![]()
Hello, Grafixjoe.
Please read one of my first replies on this topic. There are some AE plug-ins that have versions adapted to work properly in FCP. They are AE plug-ins only in the sense that they are written using the AE plug-in architecture. They are modified a bit to work properly with FCP. For practical purposes, they are After Effects plug-ins with the same functionality and usually the FCP specific version has no extra cost. As for Color Finesse: I understand that if you go and buy it from Synthetic Aperture, you'll have the right to use it with both AE and FCP (separate versions). On the other hand, the version that comes with AE is a bundle deal and that's another reason why it will only work with After Effects. The license and serial number you get is for using it with AE. All the best! Adolfo Rozenfeld Buenos Aires - Argentina www.adolforozenfeld.com
i haven't used them, but i've played with the 55mm plug ins.
wow! classy, and then some. really nice looks based on traditional lens-filters Adolfo, i just need to clear something up about CF: are you saying that it can't do power windows in FCP? that's a drag. that'd steer me away from an FCP grade, i think. cheers, nick
"Adolfo, i just need to clear something up about CF:
are you saying that it can't do power windows in FCP? that's a drag. that'd steer me away from an FCP grade, i think" Nick: I didn't want to go deeper into that, because I don't want Mike to think we're hijacking the AE plug-ins topic! (Mike, I do believe this is very relevant to the subject). I am not sure what the exact capabilities of power windows in DaVinci are, but as far as CF goes, the masking/region limiting capabilities are provided by the host application, ie a lot in After Effects, very little in FCP. As you surely know, masking tools in FCP have always been very very weak since V1.0, and Apple never updated or improved them since then. Very simple geometrical shapes (circles and rectangles), and 4 or 8 point polygonal masks (no bezier or b-splines at all) that are incredibly painful to animate (because incredibly each node is a separate property for keyframing). Some plug-in developers, like CHV, created plug-ins for bezier masking inside FCP, but they are really akward - developers don't have the proper programming "hooks" for it in FCP. They're compromise solutions. I am suprised we are not all screaming at Apple for better masking tools as a #1 feature request. I sent a couple of request messages to the team, but gave up when Motion came out. The message I saw was: FCP is not going there. Again, I believe the supposedly "upcoming" Color Finesse 2 is supposed to have built-in masking (because it's also designed to work in a standalone mode). Adolfo Rozenfeld Buenos Aires - Argentina www.adolforozenfeld.com
Adolfo Rozenfeld wrote:
> Also, a lot of these users were thrilled with the announcement > that Color Finesse was going to work with control surfaces, > just like in those expensive color correction rooms. But that > version wasn't realeased, unfortunately. I wouldn't say wasn't released rather hasn't been yet Bob says they are working at getting it out soon David at Movies Rock in Toronto [www.tofcpug.com]
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
|