Most lightweight and editable codec?

Posted by drtuzi 
Most lightweight and editable codec?
January 03, 2010 03:31PM
Been hired to create a short video tutorial for a technique in FCP7. Trying to decide sequence settings & how to transcode source footage as it must be included in download. Client wants smallest file size for complete bundle as possible. Original footage was 1280x720p (24fps) - so I thought I'd scale to 50% - but unsure of codec to use.

I'm thinking of using ProRes proxy for things that involve straight cuts and ProRes LT for anything involving color or compositing.

But I'm still looking at a pretty large download - question is:

is prores an effiecient choice for 640x360? I'd also be fine with 8 bit instead of ten.

Is there anything smaller (progressive) that won't get freaky like h.264?

Thanks in advance
Re: Most lightweight and editable codec?
January 04, 2010 01:40AM
Don't scale it- that buys you little in terms of hard drive savings and gives you a lot of headaches in terms of onlining. Go ProRes and get another hard drive if you need it. A 1 TB Firewire drive is around $300 these days and holds many many hours of ProRes LT or Proxy.

Noah

Final Cut Studio Training, featuring the HVX200, EX1, EX3, DVX100, DVDSP and Color at [www.callboxlive.com]!
Author, RED: The Ultimate Guide to Using the Revolutionary Camera available now at: [www.amazon.com].
Editors Store- Gifts and Gear for Editors: [www.editorsstore.com]
Re: Most lightweight and editable codec?
January 04, 2010 02:15AM
DV? That's tiny.



www.strypesinpost.com
Re: Most lightweight and editable codec?
January 05, 2010 10:32AM
I second DV.

Chi-Ho Lee
Film & Television Editor
Apple Certified Final Cut Pro Instructor
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

 


Google
  Web lafcpug.org

Web Hosting by HermosawaveHermosawave Internet


Recycle computers and electronics