|
Forum List
>
Café LA
>
Topic
Magic Bullet "Instant HD" filter - opinion?Posted by Kingg33
I have used it many times with success, we utilize the After Effects plug-in instead of doing it in Final Cut. You get the choice of AE or FCP when you install it. The only thing I don't love about it, is the footage needs to be progressive, so if you start with interlaced you have to do that conversion.
There are different options and it takes some testing to get it looking best for your situation.
DCA_Film Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > I have used it many times with success, we utilize > the After Effects plug-in instead of doing it in > Final Cut. You get the choice of AE or FCP when > you install it. The only thing I don't love about > it, is the footage needs to be progressive, so if > you start with interlaced you have to do that > conversion. > There are different options and it takes some > testing to get it looking best for your situation. I'll concur with that. Taken from the manual: "There is one major limitation in the current Instant HD release. The product is specifically designed to work with progressive (non-interlaced) images. That means that if you are starting with interlaced video such as a standard Sony PD150 DVCAM capture, you will need to convert the image to progressive in the host application before applying Instant HD."
I've used it, and I can testify that it works ? technically. But I've never liked the results enough to make it worth all the extra hoops you have to jump through to achieve them. If you want a crappy upscale, it's a lot easier just to pipe your footage through Compressor and let it run over a weekend.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
|