|
Show all posts by user
Page 1 of 10 Pages: 12345
Results 1 - 30 of 297
I'm looking to put Minis into our workflow here as well. Currently still running three Mac Pros, one Dell Workstations and two iMacs. All is connected to our 100TB Small Tree SAN. We convert 10gig ethernet to Thunderbolt for the iMacs and it works fine, can push up to 550MB/s to those machines so it would be the same to the Mini.
Have already tested 4k multicam with Premiere Pro using thi
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
terra100 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> But how can that work? The cloud is not like some
> people think. You are downloading the software.
> The cloud subscription just turns it on and off on
> your machine. So, waterbiscardi, this would mean
> you'd have to download (if this works and did not
> grab your computer ID) the enti
by walterbiscardi
- Adobe Premiere Pro CC
Jon Chappell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Right, but I think it's interesting if Apple is
> prepared to make a loss on FCPX despite killing
> lots of pro products in recent years.
It's interesting only in the sense that it's interesting so many people want to use a product that is such a tiny blip on a company's radar that if it was killed tomor
by walterbiscardi
- Adobe Premiere Pro CC
Unless the iPhones / iPads continue their slide and fall completely off the sales charts, FCP X doesn't have to earn anything. When you look at their sales compared to everything else on a pie chart, I was told the ProApps sales were literally a line. Too small to even be a very very small piece of pie, literally a line on the chart.
In other words, Apple doesn't even need the ProApps peri
by walterbiscardi
- Adobe Premiere Pro CC
For color grading, forget computer monitors and you'll have to spend a bit more than $1000. You want a Flanders Scientific. Those are accurate for color grading. The cheaper BMD monitor is not color accurate, it's good for reference to see what you're shooting.
flandersscientific.com We have six of these in our shop because they're accurate and the customer service is some of the best in
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
It's not "dead" Adobe said as much at NAB this past April.
Basically it's gone as far as it needs to go, according to Adobe, so no more updates moving forward. That's what they said this past April.
Encore continues to live as CS6 and is still easily available via Creative Cloud.
by walterbiscardi
- Adobe Premiere Pro CC
strypes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >Blackmagic has the most affordable at $3999 US
>
> Nope. GoPro was there first at a remarkable 1/10th
> the price of a BMD pocket camera with their Hero3.
> Just sayin'.
Ok, how about the most affordable, flexible, useful camera for a variety of projects. GoPro has its place, but the BMD will do
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
There are quite a few 4k cameras out there as we all witnessed at NAB this past April. Canon, RED, Blackmagic and I believe Sony also had one. Blackmagic has the most affordable at $3999 US. (4k for $4k was their mantra) ARRI was the notable exception.
There is a 4k consumer television for under $2000 US already.
Gary Adcock and I were talking at NAB and he's been working almost excl
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
BMD already working on OpenGL support for the new MacPro. Good news for all of us so we don't HAVE to have nVidias to run Resolve.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
How much do we really need the Rocket any longer with the strong power of the nVidia cards? Via thunderbolt adapter with this machine or via a PC tower or via their new VCA? I was under the impression these cards have almost caught up to the speed of the Rocket especially with two or more GPUs in the machine.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Adobe doesn't need to do anything quite honestly. They already support the ATI cards very nicely with CC so they're good to go.
BMD is the lone man out with the nVidia only support needed for Resolve. Knowing them they will have an answer before the Fall.
I think the strongest use of these new machines will be for remote situations. Compact power to take into the field vs. a laptop or l
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Jude Cotter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And the thing is, if you stop working (on a
> monthly payment cycle) you can stop paying with no
> penalty, and when and if you really need the
> software again, you can get it for a month (I
> think there's also about a week of grace period)
> for $20.
And as even some Adobe folks have sugge
by walterbiscardi
- Adobe Premiere Pro CC
After a day of "The Sky Is Falling" I had to write up my thoughts.
by walterbiscardi
- Adobe Premiere Pro CC
Francois Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> walterbiscardi Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > Interplay is a wholly different project than
> > Anywhere and serves a completely different
> > function ...
>
> great, so it doesn't serve collaborative editing
Interplay is more designed for an enterpr
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Depends on if they are collaborating with others outside their companies. completely independent, one / two man shops that never go outside probably won't.
I'm trying to figure out how I can make this work to utilize folks I've always wanted to work with such as Shane Ross. This might finally allow us to work together in a very easy workflow.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Francois Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am completely aware of all that. Not need to be
> grumpy
>
> For the kind of jobs mentioned before will it
> beat an "in house" Avid Interplay ? Do you think
> the industry in going to switch ?
>
> that's all I am saying.
When people say "It's a joke" or "Do
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Francois Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ok Adobe Anywhere itself is not a joke, but work
> HD video files through the net ? Please.
Can you actually do some research on how something works before you simply dismiss it offhand. Jon just provided a pretty good explanation of how it works. You can also learn more for yourself if you go to Adobe's web
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Derek gave you the options that are there before you other than stretching the image. Bottom line, you have a square box that needs to go into a rectangular hole. If you want to fill that hole, something has to give.
derekmok Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Is there any way to blow up without getting
> squeezing or stretching?
>
> Th
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
strypes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yea. That was amazing. They were also SSDs.
> Insanely fast shared storage.
Yep, nothing like 8 SSDs striped together at only, what did he say, about $3000 PER drive. The funny thing about that system is Steve had to create something that would create the throughput for the test! Simply incredible and I can't
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
Thunderbolt is definitely faster than FW800. Small Tree Communications was showing a system at NAB running dual Thunderbolt into a laptop running at 1.2GB/s. Yep, 1200MB/s.
The speed of your system depend on whom you get.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
paurray Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or how about Resolve 10. One of the fascinating
> features is that it sucks in all these different
> edits from different NLEs. Like would that not be
> intriguing if you owned a production house? Have
> editors edit on the NLE of their choice and bring
> the edit into Resolve Colour Correct, tweak a
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Francois Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
(" Adobe
> anywhere" is an internet joke for video, good for
> stills, not for us)
Adobe Anywhere has been in use for several years now by some major broadcasters as a test bed. Photographers in the field and editors in house working together in realtime. I assure you it's no joke.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Just to chime in, Oliver and I have been communicating off forum and quite honestly, having a good laugh about all the commotion. We both agree the industry should return to CMX with GVG 300 and Abekas A53D as a standard for all editing moving forward.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
Jon Chappell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For me the big question isn't the future of FCPX,
> it's the future of the Mac. Will there be a new
> Mac Pro? If so, will it be one we actually want to
> buy?
It was starting to sound like this coming week we might hear something.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
craig seeman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Walter, Oliver Peter stated.
>
> ... For example, they were showing the XAVC
> integration in an area of the Sony booth. FCP X
> was well-represented as part of other displays all
> over the floor.
>
> Were there two NABs? Were some people seeing it
> and others not? Granted NAB is
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
derekmok Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> None of it addresses the loss in confidence. I
> still haven't seen anything that would convince me
> that Apple wouldn't drop FCPX with no warning, as
> with FCP7. Everybody thought FCP7 was "here to
> stay", as well.
I always find the NAB Show Floor a good barometer for where the indust
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA - X
G-RAID has gotten better since their second generation mess and LaCie is good or bad depending on who you talk to. Many people hate them, but we've never really had an issue with them.
Now one thing about any RAID, you really want about double the storage space of what you actually need. As the drives fill up, they slow down, they get more flaky, etc..... Also, you have to take into accou
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
Master for the Theater is usually a Digital Cinema File or a 16 / 35mm print. If you're showing it at select theaters, you'll need to contact the theaters to find out what they accept and the specs for each.
For broadcast and theater screenings ALWAYS use Title Safe. For the web, yes there is extra space, but we never make a special version just for the internet. What goes online is the s
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
We edit with H264 codecs all the time now that we switched to Premiere Pro. It edits quite well actually.
FCP 7 certainly doesn't like that codec, but Premiere Pro is just fine with it.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
For this particular project it started out around 27 hours of material and it's up to around 45 hours now. Most of our documentaries average 125 - 300 hours of material so this one is pretty small by our standards.
The SAN itself is 48TB that the iMac is connected to.
by walterbiscardi
- Café LA
Page 1 of 10 Pages: 12345
|
|